Youth Violence Prevention: Funding and Scaling Effective Gang Prevention Programs

Pilot programs and small scale initiatives have shown us what works in gang prevention; now the challenge is scaling up these successes to reach all communities in need. For funders, this means thinking strategically about funding models, sustainability, and replication of effective programs. This article discusses how to fund and grow gang prevention efforts for maximum impact.

Identify Proven Programs to Scale: First, funders should look at the evidence and identify programs with demonstrated success. For instance, if a particular city’s outreach program led to a 50% reduction in shootings in one neighbourhood, consider funding its expansion to other neighbourhoods or even other cities. If a school based mentoring program kept 100 at risk kids from joining gangs, funders can ask. What would it take to serve 1,000 kids? Often, effective programs have a waiting list of youth or neighbourhoods asking for help; that is a prime opportunity for scaling. Investing in model programs to replicate them can yield quick wins because the approach is already refined. The Youth Violence Commission in the UK noted that to significantly cut violence, solutions must be implemented “at scale” rather than in isolated pockets

Capacity Building and Training: Scaling up is not just about money; it’s also about building capacity. That means ensuring there are enough trained people to carry out the work with fidelity. Funders can allocate portions of grants to train new outreach workers, counsellors, or mentors under the wing of experienced staff. Additionally, building the management capacity of community organisations is crucial; a small nonprofit doing great work might need support to hire an experienced program manager or to upgrade its data systems to handle a larger caseload. By funding these backbone needs (often via general operating support or capacity-building grants), funders enable programs to maintain quality as they grow.

Flexible, Long-Term Funding: Gang prevention isn’t a quick fix. It requires sustained effort. Therefore, moving from pilot to scale benefits from multi-year funding commitments. Long term funding allows programs to plan, retain staff (staff turnover can derail progress), and build trust in communities (which takes time). It is also wised for funders to provide flexibility in how funds are used. Rigid grants that only cover very specific activities might not allow a program to adapt to new realities (for example, if gangs shift tactics or a new hotspot emerges). Trusting successful programs with some flexible funding lets them respond to changes on the ground efficiently.

Public-Private Partnerships: Scaling often requires resources beyond what philanthropy alone can provide. This is where public sector involvement is key. Funders can play a catalytic role by piloting or demonstrating success, which then convinces government agencies to invest public funds to expand the effort. For instance, a foundation might fund a 2-year trial of a gang intervention in a city district; if the trial shows reductions in violence, the city council or national government could then allocate ongoing funding to expand it citywide. Engaging government early, sharing data and inviting officials to observe programs can pave the way for this handoff. Sometimes legislation or policy change is needed (e.g., a city might need to create a budget line for violence prevention); funders can also support advocacy to make prevention a public funding priority. The ideal scenario is braided funding, combining private grants, city funds, national grants, and even corporate sponsorship to support different pieces of a comprehensive strategy.

Scaling with Fidelity vs. Adaptation: One caution: when scaling up, ensure the core ingredients of success are not lost. If a program success hinged on, say, a very low mentor to youth ratio or the personal touch of staff, those must be preserved even as numbers grow. This might require more funding per youth than less intensive programs, a worthwhile investment if the outcomes are stronger. On the other hand, some adaptation might be needed for different contexts (what works in a small town might need tweaks in a metropolis). Funders should encourage an approach of “evaluate and adapt” during scaling: implement the model in a new site, rigorously monitor results, and be open to adjusting. Funding evaluations as part of scale up is a good practice to ensure effectiveness is maintained.

Measuring and Communicating Impact: Finally, as programs scale, measuring impact remains crucial to keep stakeholders (including funders, public, and policymakers) bought in. We know from data that prevention works, for example, for every $1 spent on prevention, several dollars in criminal justice and victim costs can be saved (various studies support this general ratio). Communicating such results keeps the momentum. Funders can help by supporting strong data systems and maybe even independent research partners to validate outcomes. Success stories, like “this many youths left gangs and are now employed or in school”, when broadcast, help attract additional funding (it creates a virtuous cycle of investment).

In summary, scaling up gang prevention programs is about amplifying success: taking what we know works and expanding its reach. It requires strategic funding that is sustained, flexible, and focused on capacity building. Collaboration with the public sector and careful attention to fidelity will help ensure that scaling up does not dilute effectiveness. If managed well, scaling proven gang prevention can transform the safety and futures of entire cities, not just isolated neighbourhoods, delivering on the promise that no young person is lost to gang violence simply for lack of opportunity or support. For funders, there is perhaps no greater legacy than enabling a small local solution to grow into a broad movement that keeps thousands of youths safe and thriving

Sources: oro.open.ac.uk.

Youth Violence Prevention: Law Enforcement and Community Collaboration in Gang Prevention

While prevention is much more than policing, law enforcement still plays a crucial role in gang prevention programs, especially when it collaborates closely with community stakeholders. Modern anti gang initiatives increasingly emphasise a balanced approach, sometimes summarised as “carrot and stick”: offering help and positive opportunities to youth (the carrot) while making very clear that violence and gang crime will result in swift consequences (the stick). Effective collaboration between the police and the community can reinforce both messages.

Focused Deterrence and “Call Ins”: One proven collaborative strategy is focused deterrence, often implemented via call in meetings. Here is how it works: Police and community leaders jointly identify a small number of individuals or gangs driving a lot of the violence. They invite these gang members to a meeting (sometimes in a courtroom or community centre) where they face a unified front, not only police and prosecutors threatening tough action if violence continues, but also mothers of victims, clergy, ex gang members, and service providers. The community voices convey moral opposition (“we want the killing to stop”), and service providers offer immediate help (job training slots, rehab, housing) if the gang members choose to step away from crime. Meanwhile, law enforcement makes it clear that if violence occurs, they will focus all resources on the group responsible (enhanced prosecutions, federal charges, etc.). This approach has shown impressive results: cities like Boston, Cincinnati, and Glasgow saw 30-60% drops in group related homicides after implementing focused deterrence. The key is the partnership, and police alone could not deliver the moral message or the help, and the community alone could not deliver the credible threat of enforcement. Together, they altered the cost benefit calculus for gang members.

Gang Units with Community Input: Many police departments have specialised gang units or youth liaison officers. Historically, some operated heavy handedly, damaging community trust. However, the trend now is towards community informed policing of gangs. This means police gang units meet regularly with community advisory boards, share data on gang activity, and listen to residents’ concerns (for example, ensuring police actions do not inadvertently target innocent youth who dress a certain way). In some areas, police invite local outreach workers or respected community figures to ride along or mediate during operations, like when delivering anti gang injunctions or dispersing gang hangouts. This transparency and cooperation help police be more surgical in their approach and improve community relations. When the West Midlands Police in England partnered with outreach teams, they were able to engage young people more respectfully during stop and search operations for knives, leading to better intelligence tips from the public and lower tension on the streets.

Information Sharing and Early Warning: Collaboration also means breaking down silos of information. Consider a scenario: a school hears that a particular student has started flashing gang signs; separately, local police notice graffiti of that gang appearing in a neighbourhood. If these pieces stay siloed, no one intervenes with that youth. But with an information sharing protocol, the police school liaison and community youth worker get looped in, and they can approach the teen and family before he becomes deeply gang involved. Some regions have created multi agency panels (with police, schools, social services, probation, etc.) that meet monthly to review “hot” cases of at risk youth and coordinate interventions. This kind of collaboration ensures that no at risk youth falls through the cracks simply because agencies were not talking to each other. One outcome of such panels in London was the earlier identification of girls getting pulled into gangs (often overlooked); once identified, they could be offered support and exit strategies, reducing exploitation and violent incidents.

Zero Tolerance for Violence, Yes Tolerance for Youth: Perhaps the most important philosophical shift in police community collaboration is this: a stance of zero tolerance for violence, but compassion for the young people. Community partners help police see gang members not just as “criminals” but often as kids in need of support. Police, for their part, help community folks see that sometimes firm enforcement is needed to keep everyone safe. Together, they can craft initiatives like gun buyback programs, where the police department might run the event, but churches and local businesses promote it and even provide incentives (gift cards, etc.). Or another example: in a high crime area, the police increase patrols to deter gang activity, but they do so while stopping at community centres to say hello, maybe playing a bit of basketball with youth, showing a human side rather than just cruising with lights flashing.

For funders, supporting law enforcement role in prevention may involve training grants (e.g. training police in adolescent development and deescalation), funding community liaison positions, or technology for better data sharing between agencies. It could also mean convening public and private task forces that include police, civic groups, and service providers to design local action plans. When law enforcement and the community are on the same team, gangs lose their biggest advantage, the community’s fear and silence. Collaborative efforts replace that with resilience and coordinated action, making neighbourhoods far less hospitable to organised crime. In essence, by funding the links between police and community, we build a united front that is exponentially more effective at preventing gang violence than either could ever be alone

Sources: gov.ukhmiprobation.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk.cvg.org

Youth Violence Prevention: Schools and After-School Programs in Gang Violence Prevention

Schools and after school programs are critical battlegrounds in the fight against gang recruitment. For many adolescents, especially in disadvantaged areas, school is the primary environment outside the home where they spend time and form social identity. Gangs know this, which is why they often try to recruit or intimidate students in and around schools. However, this also means schools are ideal settings to implement prevention initiatives and offer positive alternatives to gang culture.

Creating a Safe and Inclusive School Climate: A school that feels safe, inclusive, and full of opportunity is far less fertile ground for gangs. Key measures include enforcing strict no tolerance for gang signs, attire, or activities on campus, while also ensuring that disciplinary actions do not inadvertently push kids out (remember, exclusion can increase gang risk). Many schools partner with School Resource Officers (SROs) or community police to have a presence on campus, not as enforcers only but as mentors and role models. When students trust that adults at school can protect them, they are less likely to seek protection from a gang. Additionally, promoting a culture where students of different backgrounds mix (through group projects, house systems, etc.) can undercut gang-driven divisions like rival “postcode” or neighbourhood loyalties.

Gang Prevention Curriculum and Clubs: Some schools have adopted specific curriculum units that address gangs and violence directly. In the U.S., the G.R.E.A.T. program taught in middle schools showed short term effects in improving attitudes about police and reducing pro gang beliefs. In the U.K., organisations like St Giles Trust send trained former gang members or youth workers into schools to deliver workshops on the realities of gang life, knife crime, and criminal exploitation. These real world lessons, especially when backed with personal stories, can make teens think twice about the allure of gangs. Beyond classroom learning, schools can support extracurricular clubs focused on unity and leadership. For example, some schools have “Peace Clubs” or student councils that lead anti violence campaigns. Others involve students in producing creative work (like plays, rap songs, or art murals) that explore the consequences of gang violence, a therapeutic and educational exercise.

After-School Programs as a Shield: The hours immediately after school are a high risk time for gang involvement and youth crime. That is why afterschool programs are often cited as a key gang prevention strategy. These programs range from academic tutoring and homework help (keeping kids on track academically, which itself is protective) to recreational activities (sports teams, dance classes, coding clubs, etc.). When well run, after-school programs provide supervision, mentorship, and a sense of belonging that competes directly with what gangs offer. A noteworthy statistic: in London, cuts to after school youth clubs correlated with a rise in local teen crime, whereas areas maintaining robust youth services saw steadier youth outcomes. Essentially, if youths find camaraderie and achievement in a club or team, they have much less incentive to seek it in a gang.

Mentorship and Academic Support: It is worth highlighting mentorship within schools. Some schools set up peer mentoring, where older students mentor incoming younger ones by providing guidance and looking out for them (reducing their vulnerability to gang bullying). Additionally, many communities mentoring programs coordinate with schools so that mentors can meet students on campus or communicate with teachers. Academic struggles can make a student feel disconnected and more likely to fall in with bad influences; a mentor or tutor who helps a student improve grades and confidence can indirectly prevent gang attraction by boosting the student’s legitimate success and self esteem.

From the funder perspective, supporting schools in gang prevention might involve financing special program coordinators who can run these clubs and curricula, or grants for schools to partner with nonprofits (like paying for those workshop speakers or training teachers in gang awareness). It may also involve funding transportation, one often overlooked barrier is that some youth can’t stay for after school programs because there’s no late bus, and they fear walking home through gang territories. Solving such logistics can markedly increase program participation.

In conclusion, schools are pivotal: they can either be pipelines feeding into gangs (if unsafe or neglectful) or pipelines to success (if nurturing and engaging). By backing initiatives that transform schools into hubs of safety, learning, and belonging after 3 PM, funders can effectively shut off one of the main funnels into gang life. The evidence is clear that when students are supported and proud of their school community, gangs lose their foothold among the youth.

Youth Violence Prevention:Salman Ramadan Abedi: The Manchester Arena Bombing (2017)

On the night of 22 May 2017, a suicide bomber struck the Manchester Arena at the end of an Ariana Grande pop concert, committing one of Britain most horrific terrorist acts.

The perpetrator was Salman Ramadan Abedi, a 22 year old British born man of Libyan descent. As thousands of young fans, many of them children and teenagers, streamed out of the arena, Abedi detonated an explosive device packed with shrapnel in the foyer.

The blast was devastating: 22 people were killed, the youngest just eight years old and over 800 were injured or deeply traumatised. The scene was one of chaos and grief, with parents frantically searching for missing kids amid the smoke.

This bombing remains Britain deadliest terror attack since 7/7, targeting a venue filled with innocent youth. ISIS quickly claimed responsibility, hailing Abedi as one of its “soldiers,” although no evidence has emerged that the group directed him from abroad. Authorities believe he was inspired by jihadist ideology and possibly assisted by family members.

Investigations revealed that Abedi had become radicalised and had travelled to Libya, his parents’ homeland during its civil war, where he may have had contact with extremist militants.

Abedi was known to UK security services before the attack, but tragically, the warnings were not acted upon in time. In the years before 2017, MI5 received at least two pieces of intelligence about Abedi that, in hindsight, were highly significant.

Reportedly, one was information that he was associating with a North African Islamist faction, and another that hinted at his bomb making aspirations. In March 2023, the official public inquiry into the Manchester bombing delivered a damning assessment: MI5’s failure to act on those tips was a significant missed opportunity to possibly prevent the atrocity.

The inquiry chairman, Sir John Saunders, stated there was a “realistic possibility” the attack could have been foiled had MI5 pursued the intelligence more urgently. One Security Service officer admitted that, had the data come in today, it would prompt an immediate investigation.

The families of the victims, hearing this, described the findings as “devastating” and “unacceptable,” knowing that “at the very least, a real possibility of preventing this attack was lost.” The head of MI5 publicly apologised, acknowledging that the agency “did not prevent the attack” and “profoundly regrets” not stopping Abedi when they had the chance.

Aftermath: Abedi died in his suicide attack. Within days, police arrested his younger brother, Hashem Abedi, who had helped him stockpile materials; Hashem was later convicted of 22 counts of murder for assisting in the plot and was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum of 55 years.

The Manchester bombing sparked an outpouring of solidarity exemplified by the city slogan “Manchester Strong” and a benefit concert led by Ariana Grande, but also soul-searching about how a local youth, Abedi, grew up in Manchester, became a mass murderer.

It underscored the persistent threat of ISIS-inspired terrorism even as ISIS was losing territory in the Middle East. The UK government and intelligence agencies implemented reforms post-inquiry, aiming to improve the handling of intelligence “dots” so they are connected faster.

Still, for the families who lost daughters, sons, parents, and loved ones that night, the knowledge that the horror might have been averted is a painful burden. As one bereaved mother put it, “We send our kids to a concert and they do not come home, that should never have happened.” The Manchester Arena attack will be remembered as a tragedy that perhaps could have been prevented, and as a reminder of why vigilance against extremist violence must never wane.

Youth Violence Prevention: Prioritising Youth Mental Health: A Policy Imperative

In a paediatric clinic, doctors are seeing more teenagers with anxiety, depression, and stress related complaints than ever before. One 14 year old, “Jamal,” visits frequently with headaches and stomach aches, physical symptoms of underlying anxiety about school and the future. Jamal story is increasingly common. Experts have been sounding the alarm about a youth mental health crisis. Around 20% of adolescents experience a diagnosable mental health problem in any given year. Half of all mental disorders begin by age 14, and three quarters by age 24. Yet our systems are woefully unprepared: about 70% of young people who need mental health services do not receive appropriate care early on. As policymakers, addressing youth mental health is not just a health issue. .iI’s about safeguarding the next generation’s potential and well being.

The High Stakes: Untreated mental health issues in youth can derail lives. Depression and anxiety can lead to lower academic performance, increased dropout rates, and difficulty entering the workforce. Tragically, suicide has become a leading cause of death among young people in many countries. Beyond the human toll, there is an economic cost: when young adults cannot fully participate in society due to mental illness, productivity suffers, and healthcare costs rise due to crises that could have been prevented with early intervention.

Strengthening Early Intervention: Policies should ensure that mental health care is as accessible as a physical exam. This means integrating mental health professionals into school settings, where teens spend much of their time. For example, increasing funding to hire more school counsellors, psychologists, or social workers can provide students like Jamal a trusted person to turn to. Routine mental health screenings in schools or pediatric offices can catch issues early, much like vision or hearing tests do. Some regions have mobile mental health clinics that visit schools, making it easier for youth to get help without stigma.

Expanding Services and Access: The 70% treatment gap often stems from a lack of services or barriers like cost and transportation. Government investment is needed to expand child and adolescent mental health services, especially in underserved areas. This might include establishing community youth mental health centres and ensuring services are covered by insurance or provided free for those in need. Telemental health (therapy via phone or video) is another avenue to reach youth, particularly in rural areas. Policies should support its development and address privacy concerns.

Workforce and Training: There is a global shortage of child psychiatrists and therapists. Incentivise training in these specialities through scholarships or loan forgiveness for those who serve in high need communities. Also, training general practitioners and paediatricians in basic mental health care can help widen the safety net they can handle mild cases and refer severe ones appropriately.

Holistic and Preventative Approaches: Beyond clinical services, consider policies that foster environments conducive to good mental health. Promote school programs on social emotional learning, which teach kids coping skills, empathy, and resilience. Implement anti bullying legislation and online safety regulations, since bullying (both offline and cyber) is a known risk factor for mental illness. Encouraging schools to adopt reasonable homework loads and start times that align with adolescent sleep needs can also reduce stress. Public awareness campaigns can combat stigma, making it more likely that teens (and their parents) will seek help early rather than hide struggles.

A shining example comes from countries like Australia, which developed the “headspace” program a national network of youth mental health centres offering easy to access, youth friendly services. Since its launch, thousands of young Australians have gotten help in a comfortable setting, often before issues escalate.

Every Jamal deserves support to navigate life challenges. By prioritising youth mental health in our policies and budgets, we send a clear message: we value our young people not just for the economic role they will play, but as human beings whose health and happiness matter. Investing in their mental well-being now will pay dividends in a healthier, more resilient society in the years to come.

 

Source mentalhealth.org.uk

Youth Violence Prevention: Education Reform: Equipping Youth for the Future

Imagine a classroom today: students tapping on tablets, accessing information instantly that once required hours in a library. Yet, paradoxically, many education systems have not fundamentally changed in decades. As the world races forward, our schools often lag. A stark warning comes from global experts: at current rates, by 2030, over half of the world young people will not have the basic skills needed for the modern This skills gap is not just about technical know how; it encompasses critical thinking, creativity, and adaptability, the very competencies tomorrow economy will demand. Policymakers face a pivotal task: to reform education so the next generation can thrive in a rapidly changing world.

The Challenge: Several factors contribute to this looming skills crisis. In many regions, curricula remain heavily focused on rote learning and outdated content. Students might memorise facts about the 19th century, yet graduate without knowing how to code, analyse data, or distinguish reliable information online. The “fourth industrial revolution”, marked by AI, automation, and digitalisation, is transforming jobs dramatically. It’s telling that nearly three-quarters of companies globally are adopting advanced technologies, yet education in lower income countries, especially, is struggling to keep pace. Furthermore, inequality in education means that in some countries, only a fraction of youth complete secondary education at all. If current trends continue, many developing countries will have a majority of youth unprepared for jobs of 2030 and beyond

Key Reforms:

  • Curriculum Overhaul: We must shift from fact recall to skill application. This means integrating STEM (science, technology, engineering, math) and soft skills (communication, teamwork, problem-solving) into all subjects. Countries like Finland have experimented with phenomenon based learning teaching by topics (like climate change or entrepreneurship) that cross disciplinary lines, giving students a richer, real world context for knowledge. Including digital literacy and coding basics early on is vital; even if not every student becomes a programmer, understanding how technology works is akin to literacy in this century.
  • Teacher Training and Support: Educators are the linchpin of reform. Investing in continuous teacher training ensures they are prepared to teach new material and use new pedagogies (like project based learning or flipped classrooms). In Singapore, for instance, teachers regularly upskill, which has helped their students consistently excel globally. We should also empower teachers with flexibility, less “teach to the test” and more encouragement to innovate in their teaching methods.
  • Lifelong and Adaptive Learning: The future of work likely involves multiple career changes and continuous learning. Education policy should extend beyond K-12 schooling to create pathways for lifelong learning. This includes vocational training, community colleges, online certification programs, and other avenues for young adults to reskill or upskill. For example, Germany robust vocational system provides apprenticeships in a wide range of trades, giving non university bound youth valuable skills and jobs.

Bridging the Inequality Gap: Within countries, disadvantaged communities often have poorer quality schools, outdated materials, or fewer qualified teachers. Targeted funding is needed to ensure no youth is left behind, be it upgrading rural schools with internet access or providing scholarships and stipends to keep kids in school. Public private partnerships can help; tech companies could adopt schools to provide equipment and training, for instance.

Time is of the essence. Each year we delay reform, millions of students graduate unprepared, and our economies lose potential innovators and skilled workers. On the other hand, imagine the payoff if we get it right: a generation of young people fluent in technology, capable of critical thought, and ready to solve problems we can not yet foresee. These are the entrepreneurs who will create jobs, the engineers who will build sustainable infrastructure, and the informed citizens who will uphold democracy. In essence, education reform is nation building. By committing resources and political will to modernise education now, policymakers can ensure the youth of today become the driving force of a prosperous tomorrow.

Source: theirworld.org.

Youth Violence Prevention: A Seat at the Table: Youth Representation in Policy

At a city council meeting on urban development, a 60 year old official discusses plans for a new park. In the audience sits 17 year old Luis, who organised neighbourhood teens to petition for a skate park in that very place. Luis and his friends spent weeks gathering input from local youth, the primary users of parks, yet none of them has a vote in the final decision. This scenario plays out globally: policies affecting young people are often made with minimal youth input. While half the world population is under 30, only 2.8% of the world’s parliamentarians are 30 or younger. This generation gap in governance is not just unfair; it can lead to shortsighted policies that overlook youth needs and innovative ideas.

Why Youth Voices Matter: Young people bring fresh perspectives to long-standing problems. They are digital natives, more attuned to technological and environmental changes, and often more idealistic about social justice. They are also the ones who will live longest with the outcomes of today laws, whether it is climate regulations, education reform, or national debt. Excluding them means missing insight from those with the biggest stake in the future. On issues like climate change, youth activists worldwide have pushed leaders to act more boldly, reminding policymakers of the moral urgency. History shows movements led by youth (from civil rights to anti-apartheid) have been catalysts for profound change. Yet in formal politics, youth remain underrepresented, sometimes due to age restrictions or political structures that favour seasoned candidates.

Bridging the Gap: Policymakers can take concrete steps to involve young voices. Firstly, consider establishing youth advisory councils at the local and national levels. These councils, composed of diverse young people, can review proposed policies and provide feedback. Some cities have experimented with youth observers in council meetings or even youth cochairs on committees dealing with youth-centric issues like education or housing. Secondly, lowering the voting age for local elections (as some jurisdictions have done to 16) can empower youth to influence decisions early and develop lifelong civic engagement habits. When Scotland included 16 and 17 year olds in its independence referendum, it saw remarkably high turnout among those first time voters, dispelling myths about youth apathy.

Reducing Barriers to Entry: Encouraging youth representation also means grooming the next generation of leaders. Political parties can recruit and mentor young candidates, and perhaps consider quota systems for youth similar to those used for improving gender representation. Civic education is crucial, too. Schools should teach not just history but practical civics: how to campaign, how to engage representatives, how to craft policy proposals. For many young people, politics feels inaccessible or corrupt; we need to show positive examples of youth leading effectively. Around the world, a growing number of youth parliaments and model UN conferences are training teenagers in governance. These are not just extracurriculars; they are pipelines for future lawmakers.

The case for youth inclusion is not about tokenism; it is about better governance. Take the example of a city that planned a new bus route but overlooked that it bypassed a high school; a 16 year old student on a youth council pointed out the oversight, leading to a route change that boosted student attendance. When we integrate perspectives like Luis into formal decision making, policies become more responsive and equitable. Ultimately, democracy is healthiest when all segments of society have a voice, including the young. As policymakers, we must ensure that we’re not crafting a world for youth but rather with youth. Their energy, creativity, and firsthand experience of contemporary challenges are invaluable assets in policymaking – and our institutions must evolve to give youth a rightful seat at the table.

Source: ipu.org.

Youth Violence Prevention: Investing in Youth: Why It Matters for Our Future

At a community centre job fair, 19 year old Amina nervously approaches a company booth. She is bright and motivated, but like many of her peers, she is struggling to find work without experience. Her situation reflects a global challenge. Even as economies recover, youth unemployment remains stubbornly high; nearly 65 million young people worldwide are still out of work. In 2023, roughly one in five youth were not in employment, education, or training (the “NEET” population). These aren’t just numbers; they represent millions of Aminas, full of potential but needing opportunities. For policymakers, the message is clear: investing in our youth is not just a moral imperative, it’s an economic and social necessity.

The Cost of Inaction: Youth who remain unemployed or underemployed carry scars that can last a lifetime, lower earnings, poorer health, and disengagement from civic life. High youth joblessness is also linked to social unrest; when young people feel left out of the economy, frustration can boil over into instability. Conversely, when youth find meaningful work, they contribute to economic growth, innovation, and a stronger social fabric. By neglecting this generation, we risk a future workforce that is ill prepared and an economy that is less competitive.

Education to Employment Gap: A common refrain from employers is that young applicants lack the skills needed for today jobs. Indeed, there is often a mismatch between what schools teach and what the market demands. Policymakers should bridge this gap. This means updating education curricula to include practical and digital skills and expanding vocational training and apprenticeships. For example, countries that have invested in apprenticeship programs (pairing classroom learning with on the job training) often see smoother school to work transitions. Aligning education with industry needs can turn youth into job creators as well as job seekers, especially with the right support for entrepreneurship.

Targeted Investments: Not all youth face the same barriers. Rural youth, young women, and those from disadvantaged backgrounds may need tailored interventions. Consider funding mentorship and internship programs that specifically reach marginalised communities. Support services like career counselling, resume workshops, and interview training in schools can demystify the hiring process for first time job seekers. Additionally, investing in youth mental health and well being is crucial; unemployment can take a psychological toll, and we want resilient, not disheartened, young citizens.

Public Private Partnerships: Governments need not tackle this alone. Encourage businesses to be part of the solution, perhaps through tax incentives for companies that hire and train young workers, or public private initiatives like coding bootcamps and innovation hubs. When Microsoft launched its Global Skills Initiative during the pandemic, it partnered with governments to equip millions of young people with digital skills, showing the impact of collaborative effort.

Amina story has a hopeful trajectory. Thanks to a government-funded youth employment scheme, she landed a three month internship that gave her real experience, and the company gained a fresh perspective from a tech savvy young mind. She is now a full time employee and even mentors other youths at the same community centre. Her success story can be replicated at scale with the right policies. Each dollar invested in youth employment, education, or training yields returns in the form of productive workers, innovators, and engaged citizens. As policymakers, committing to youth is essentially committing to our nation’s future prosperity and stability. The next generation is ready to contribute; it is our job to clear the path for them.

Youth Violence Prevention: Raising a Changemaker Encouraging Teens to Engage in Community

Sixteen year old Priya used to spend weekends holed up in her room. That changed when her father convinced her to help out at a local food drive one Saturday. At first, Priya was reluctant and shy, sticking close to her dad. But by the end of the day, she was laughing and sorting canned goods with other teens, proud of the boxes of food they had collected for families in need. Stories like Priya show the transformative power of community engagement. In fact, about 40% of young people aged 16–24 volunteer specifically to gain new skills and boost their well-being. Helping others doesn’t just benefit the community; it helps teens thrive.

Why Volunteering and Civic Action Matter: Teenage years are when young people are discovering who they are and what they care about. Volunteering or getting involved in causes can give them a sense of purpose beyond academics or social circles. Priya, for example, found she loved working with people and felt useful. Research shows volunteering can improve mental health and reduce feelings of isolation. Teens build empathy as they meet individuals from different walks of life and see the impact of lending a hand. Whether it’s a neighbourhood clean up, a charity fundraiser, or a youth climate strike, engaging in community activities teaches valuable lessons in responsibility and teamwork.

The Skills Gained: These experiences are also practical learning opportunities. A teen who organises a charity car wash learns about planning and marketing; one who volunteers at an animal shelter picks up knowledge about veterinary care and humane treatment. Such skills can spark new interests or even career paths. Many employers and colleges value volunteer work because it often instils leadership, communication, and problem-solving abilities in young people. Importantly, teens themselves recognise these gains, which is one reason so many volunteer to build skills for their future.

How Parents Can Encourage Engagement: Getting a teen to step out of their comfort zone can be challenging, but parents have a big influence. Consider these strategies:

  • Connect to Their Interests: Find causes that match your teen passions. If they love sports, maybe they can help coach younger kids. If they are into art, perhaps they can paint a mural for a community centre.
  • Start Small and Local: Sometimes it’s less intimidating to volunteer with people they know. School clubs, faith groups, or community centres often have youth friendly projects. Join in as a family if possible; making it a shared activity can motivate hesitant teens.
  • Celebrate Efforts: Praise your teen for caring about others and share stories of young heroes making a difference. Knowing that their actions, however small, matter to someone can be a huge confidence booster.

Priya’s one day of volunteering turned into a weekly habit. She not only made new friends, but she also became more confident at school, even speaking up more in class. Her parents noticed she seemed happier and more responsible at home, too. By encouraging and supporting your teen’s community involvement, you are helping them build character, compassion, and a sense of empowerment. In a world that often tells teens they are “too young” to make an impact, you can help show them that their contributions are valued and that they can be the changemakers our communities need.

The Power of Parental Involvement in Education

When it comes to school success, parents are a secret weapon. Consider two students: One has a parent who checks homework, attends school meetings, and chats regularly with their child about classes. The other parent assumes “school is the teachers’ domain” and stays hands off. Over time, the difference in these students can be striking. Research backs this up: students with supportive, engaged parents are 81% more likely to graduate from high school than their peers. Parental involvement, from simple encouragement to active participation at school, can profoundly shape a child academic journey.

Why Your Involvement Matters: Teenagers might act like they do not want you around, but your interest in their education sends a powerful message: that their schooling is important and worthy of your time. This boosts their own motivation. Children with involved parents attend school more regularly, have better social skills, and adapt more easily. Even discussions at home make a difference. One study found that teens who frequently discuss schoolwork with parents have significantly higher odds of pursuing college. Your engagement can counteract challenges; for instance, a student struggling in math might work harder if they know their parent is checking in and ready to help or find help.

Forms of Involvement: Being involved does not mean doing your child homework or hovering over every assignment. It takes many forms, such as:

  • Communication with Teachers: Attend parent-teacher conferences and school events when you can. If your schedule is tight, a quick email to a teacher for an update shows you care. Working as a team with teachers helps address issues early, whether it’s a dip in grades or a social challenge in class.
  • Homework Support: Provide a quiet space and time for homework. You don’t need to understand algebra to show support; ask your teen about their assignments, and praise their efforts and improvements. If they’re struggling, help them brainstorm solutions (could we get a tutor? join a study group?).
  • Stay Informed and Encourage Goals: Keep track of their progress through report cards or online portals. Celebrate achievements and progress, not just top grades. Help them set academic goals that are realistic and theirs, like improving in science this term or reading a certain number of books.

Creating a Learning Environment at Home: Simple routines reinforce that education is valued. Having a set homework time, asking “what did you learn today?” at dinner, or even watching a documentary together can spark learning. Show curiosity about the world – teens model what they see. If you read or pursue your own learning, it normalises intellectual growth at home.

Take the story of Marcus, whose mother started volunteering at his school library one day a week. Seeing her regularly on campus made him proud (even if he had never admitted it to friends). He started stopping by to say hi and ended up checking out more books in the process. Marcus knew his mom and teachers talked often, a safety net ensuring he did not slip through cracks. He graduated with good grades and confidence, a trajectory shaped in part by that consistent parental presence.

Your involvement shows your teen that you are invested in their future. It is like a safety harness. As they climb the ladder of education, they still do the climbing, but your support secures them when the climb gets steep. No matter your own educational background or how “busy” your teen seems, your engagement can be the difference between stumbling and soaring in school.

Building Trust and Communication with Your Teen

On Friday night, 17 year old Sam missed his curfew by an hour. His dad was worried and angry, and his first instinct was to ground Sam for a month. But he paused, took a breath, and instead sat down with his son to talk. Sam, it turned out, had driven a friend home who was having a personal crisis, and he lost track of time. In that conversation, father and son developed a plan: next time, Sam would call or text if he was running late. This scenario highlights a key parenting challenge: balancing supervision and trust. Research shows that active, caring parental monitoring – knowing where your teen is and who they are with can significantly reduce the likelihood of teens engaging in risky behaviours. But how you approach monitoring makes all the difference. It works best when grounded in open communication and mutual respect, not surveillance or fear.

Why Trust Matters: Teens are wired to seek independence; it’s a normal part of growing up. When parents show they trust their teen (for example, by extending curfews gradually or allowing solo outings once ground rules are set), teens often rise to the occasion to keep that trust. On the other hand, if a teen feels “My parents assume I’ll mess up no matter what,” they might hide things or rebel more. The goal is for your teen to see you as a safe confidant, not just an enforcer. Establishing trust does not mean being naïve; it means creating a relationship where your teen is honest because they know you’ll listen and be fair.

Communication is Key: How do you build that kind of relationship? It starts with everyday talks. Instead of only grilling them about where they’re going and with whom, make it a habit to chat about their day, their friends, and their interests. Active listening is powerful: when your teen talks, really pay attention (put down that phone or turn off the TV) and acknowledge their feelings. Even if you hear something concerning, try not to explode in the moment. Stay calm and ask questions. This shows your teen that they can bring problems or mistakes to you without instantly losing their cool.

Setting Boundaries Together: Teens actually appreciate clear boundaries it gives them a sense of security. The magic is to involve them in setting some rules. You might say, “We both agree safety is important. Let decide on fair rules for when you go out.” By collaborating, your teen is more likely to follow the rules because they had a voice in them. For instance, Sam and his dad agreed on a texting rule for late nights. Also explain the “why” behind rules: “I need to know where you are so I can help if something goes wrong, not because I want to invade your privacy.” When teens understand that monitoring comes from love, not lack of trust, they are more receptive.

Picking Your Battles: Not every misstep needs a heavy hand. Save serious consequences for serious breaches of trust (like dangerous behaviour or repeated lying). Smaller issues, an occasionally messy room or a C on a quiz can be handled with patience and coaching rather than punishment. If rules are broken, enforce consequences consistently, but also talk about what happened and how to regain trust.

Remember that according to studies, over 86% of teens report their parents generally know where they are most of the time. That is a reassuring statistic; it means in most families, parents are keeping tabs in caring ways. Aim to be the parent who knows what is going on in your teen life, not because you’ve pried it out of them, but because they chose to tell you. By building a foundation of trust and communication, you guide your teen safely toward adulthood and strengthen your relationship along the way.

Source: positiveaction.net, cdc.gov, vssn.org.uk

Youth Violence Prevention:Schools and After-School Programs in Gang Violence Prevention

Schools and after-school programs are critical battlegrounds in the fight against gang recruitment. For many adolescents, especially in disadvantaged areas, school is the primary environment outside the home where they spend time and form social identity. Gangs know this – which is why they often try to recruit or intimidate students in and around schools. However, this also means schools are ideal settings to implement prevention initiatives and offer positive alternatives to gang culture.

Creating a Safe and Inclusive School Climate: A school that feels safe, inclusive, and full of opportunity is far less fertile ground for gangs. Key measures include enforcing strict no-tolerance for gang signs, attire, or activities on campus, while also ensuring that disciplinary actions don’t inadvertently push kids out (remember, exclusion can increase gang risk). Many schools partner with School Resource Officers (SROs) or community police to have a presence on campus, not as enforcers only but as mentors and role models. When students trust that adults at school can protect them, they’re less likely to seek protection from a gang. Additionally, promoting a culture where students of different backgrounds mix (through group projects, house systems, etc.) can undercut gang-driven divisions like rival “postcode” or neighbourhood loyalties.

Gang Prevention Curriculum and Clubs: Some schools have adopted specific curriculum units that address gangs and violence directly. In the U.S., the G.R.E.A.T. program taught in middle schools showed short-term effects in improving attitudes about police and reducing pro-gang beliefs. In the U.K., organisations like St Giles Trust send trained former gang members or youth workers into schools to deliver workshops on the realities of gang life, knife crime, and criminal exploitation. These real-world lessons, especially when backed with personal stories, can make teens think twice about the allure of gangs. Beyond classroom learning, schools can support extracurricular clubs focused on unity and leadership. For example, some schools have “Peace Clubs” or student councils that lead anti-violence campaigns. Others involve students in producing creative work (like plays, rap songs, or art murals) that explore the consequences of gang violence – a therapeutic and educational exercise.

After-School Programs as a Shield: The hours immediately after school are a high-risk time for gang involvement and youth crime. That’s why after school programs are often cited as a key gang prevention strategy. These programs range from academic tutoring and homework help (keeping kids on track academically, which itself is protective) to recreational activities (sports teams, dance classes, coding clubs, etc.). When well-run, after-school programs provide supervision, mentorship, and a sense of belonging that competes directly with what gangs offer. A noteworthy statistic: in London, cuts to after-school youth clubs correlated with a rise in local teen crime, whereas areas maintaining robust youth services saw steadier youth outcomes. Essentially, if youths find camaraderie and achievement in a club or team, they have much less incentive to seek it in a gang.

Mentorship and Academic Support: It’s worth highlighting mentorship within schools. Some schools set up peer mentoring, where older students mentor incoming younger ones – providing guidance and looking out for them (reducing their vulnerability to gang bullying). Additionally, many community mentoring programs coordinate with schools so that mentors can meet students on campus or communicate with teachers. Academic struggles can make a student feel disconnected and more likely to fall in with bad influences; a mentor or tutor who helps a student improve grades and confidence can indirectly prevent gang attraction by boosting the student’s legitimate success and self-esteem.

From the funder’s perspective, supporting schools in gang prevention might involve financing special program coordinators who can run these clubs and curricula, or grants for schools to partner with nonprofits (like paying for those workshop speakers or training teachers in gang awareness). It may also involve funding transportation – one often overlooked barrier is that some youth can’t stay for after-school programs because there’s no late bus, and they fear walking home through gang territories. Solving such logistics can markedly increase program participation.

In conclusion, schools are pivotal: they can either be pipelines feeding into gangs (if unsafe or neglectful) or pipelines to success (if nurturing and engaging). By backing initiatives that transform schools into hubs of safety, learning, and belonging after 3 PM, funders can effectively shut off one of the main funnels into gang life. The evidence is clear that when students are supported and proud of their school community, gangs lose their foothold among the youth.

Source: oro.open.ac.uk   ifs.org.uk